Spanish Pundit (II)

septiembre 24, 2007

Afganistán: Bush vs Zapatero, dos italianos secuestrados, Irán y los búnkeres talibanes

Libertad Digital: Bush exige a Zapatero más presencia en Afganistán si quiere colocar al general Sanz en la OTAN

A dos meses de la votación en Bruselas, sede de la Alianza Atlántica, comienzan a realizarse movimientos encaminados a valorar si realmente el candidato español es el militar idóneo para estar al frente de un comité, al que le corresponde la misión de aprobar los documentos y planes de la OTAN.Según publica este domingo el diario ABC, EEUU, pieza clave en la elección (el comandante supremo para Europa es el general estadounidense John Craddock) no ve con buenos ojos este nombramiento, y no por la personalidad o la valía del general en cuestión, sino por las reticencias que despierta el papel de la España de Zapatero en el orden internacional, tras la sonada espantada en la Guerra de Irak.

Por eso, según afirma el diario de Vocento, los estadounidenses no descartan condicionar su apoyo a Félix Sanz Roldán a “un mayor compromiso” de España en la misión que lleva a cabo la OTAN en este país asiático. Esto se traduce, según fuentes de la Alianza, en más tropas y un papel más activo de las mismas sobre el terreno.

De momento, el Gobierno de Zapatero se ha negado a enviar más tropas. Máxime cuando la zona este donde se encuentran las tropas españolas es cada vez más comprometida y aumenta la inseguridad por la mayor presencia de talibanes, que han llegado procedentes del sur de Afganistán, tras la ofensiva americana que los ha desplazado hacia el norte.

Todo ello juega en contra de Félix Sanz Roldán, cuya candidatura se ha presentado en el peor momento de la misión en Afganistán, la principal que desarrolla la OTAN y que se ha convertido en el mayor desafío y en el que esta organización se juega su prestigio.

Era de esperar…

Al mismo tiempo, dos italianos han sido secuestrados en el oeste de Afganistán, junto con sus dos ayudantes afganos. Estaban realizando tareas de relación con los autoridades civiles afganas. La misión italiana en Herat, está intentando localizarles. El presidente Hamid Karzai ha dicho que en cuanto tengan alguna noticia la hará llegar a Italia.

Irán ha sido otra vez acusado de mandar armas a los talibanes y las tropas inglesas han encontrado algunos búnkers de los Talibán.

___________________________

Zapatero wants Spanish General Sanz Roldán to lead NATO, a very surprising wish considering that Spanish PM is not a very good friend of USA, leader of NATO, and the shameful withdrawal from Iraq.

So Bush has asked Zapatero for more support in Afghanistan in exchange of US support to Gral Sanz Roldán. Zapatero’s Government has announced Spain is not sending more troops to the Asian country, as the ones who are already there have a very compromised situation and the insecurity is rising because of the increasing presence of the Talibans there, who are arriving from the South, after US offensive.

A very illogical decision: as there are more Talibans, I am not sending more troops.

From Yahoo:

Two Italian military personnel were believed to have been kidnapped in western Afghanistan, and police Sunday said they were searching for the pair and their two Afghan staff.

At a meeting at the United Nations, Afghan President Hamid Karzai told participants he had information about where the Italians were and would pass the information to Italian authorities, said U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad.

In northeastern Afghanistan, meanwhile, NATO helicopters fired on a group of suspected insurgents in response to a rocket attack. Four Afghans died and 12 were wounded, the alliance said, and officials were investigating whether the dead and wounded were Afghan police or civilians targeted mistakenly.

The two missing Italians, with their Afghan driver and translator, drove through a police checkpoint in the Shindand district of Herat province on Saturday, and they have not had any contact with anyone since, said Gen. Ali Khan Hassanzada, chief of police criminal investigations in western Afghanistan.

An official from the Italian embassy in Kabul said the Italians last spoke with officials at their base on Saturday night during “routine contact.” The Italian military in Herat was trying to reach them again.

We believe they have been kidnapped together with two Afghans,” the Italian Defense Ministry said. “The personnel were carrying out liaison activities with local civilian authorities.”

Meanwhile, Iran is once again accused of giving weapons to the Taliban (and yet, Ahmi is going to speak to the American people…) and UK troops have uncovered some Taleban bunkers.

Anuncios

Iran’s Ahmadinejad: No attack on Israel

Filed under: EEUU/USA,Irán/Iran — Nora @ 9:39 pm

Ahmadinejad, when leaving Teheran, thought US nationals love him:

Nonetheless, before he left Tehran for New York on Sunday, Ahmadinejad told Iran’s state-run media that he believes Americans want to hear him out.

Although these were how he was described:

‘TEHRAN’TING LUNATIC … bloody handed villain … bearded blowhard” —New York Post.

“Iranian thug … madman” — New York Daily News.

“Maniac” — Republican Rep. Vito Fossella of Staten Island.

“Can’t get a decent haircut” —Post columnist Andrea Peyser.

Iran’s Ahmadinejad: No attack on Israel – Yahoo! News

NEW YORK – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Monday that Iran would not launch an attack on Israel or any other country, and he does not believe the U.S. is preparing for war against Iran. “Iran will not attack any country,” Ahmadinejad told The Associated Press, when asked if his country would ever strike first against Israel.Iran has always maintained a defensive policy, not an offensive one, he said, and has “never sought to expand its territory.”

He said he did not believe the U.S. was preparing for war.

“I believe that some of the talk in this regard arises first of all from anger. Secondly, it serves the electoral purposes domestically in this country. Third, it serves as a cover for policy failures over Iraq.”

Ahmadinejad dismissed statements by U.S. military officers and intelligence reports that Iran secretly provides weapons to insurgents fighting against U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, particularly the shaped projectiles that have harmed U.S. troops in roadside attacks.

“Why would we want to do that?” Ahmadinejad declared. “This would really be inappropriate for us. We are friends with both Iraq and Afghanistan. Insecurity in Iraq and Afghanistan undermines our own national security; it basically goes against what we believe.”

Hehehehe! This man is un-be-lie-va-ble! He has said repeatedly that he wants to wipe Israel off the map and now he says he does not want to attack anyone.

The problem can be even worse because it appears Iran has bought three nuclear heads from Kazakhstan. Paolo has left me a comment to tell me about the news:

According to Regnar Rasmussen, who was worked as an interpreter and analyst for the Special Forces of the Danish Army, and in the Criminal Police Department of his country, the key to the Iranian nuclear problem happened back in 1991, when the President from Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbaiev sold three nuclear warheads to Iran.

In autumn 1991 Nursultan Nazarbayev, the president of Khazakhstan, sold three nuclear warheads to the Iranians. The Iranians wanted to use them as a prototype for their own bomb manufacturing. The price was said to have been 7.5 billion USD. Whether this amount is true or just the fantasies of a less paid government official, I cannot verify. The amount was to cover all bribes and kick-offs and military protection during transport. Every country involved had demanded their fair share of the deal.

Anyway, the warheads were removed from a military depot somewhere in Kazakhstan and transported by train down to Makhachkala in Daghestan. Here they were reloaded onto huge trucks and then taken through the Caucasian region and into Turkey. In the city of Dogubeyazit the Iranians met the convoy and took over. The three vehicles were then driven by Iranian drivers down to the border post Bazargan, where they entered Iranian territory.

The warheads were brought down to Teheran and parked in the military campus Lavizan. Here they were seen by a soldier who later defected to Israel and told the story to the Israeli intelligence services who at that time were unable to verify the matter further. Various rumours have been circulating ever since. Some stories say two bombs, some say four. The correct number, however, is three.

Long before the downfall of communism in 1989 nuclear technology had been proliferated by the Soviet Union. The Mullah Regime had had connections and cooperation with the Soviet Union since the early days of the Islamic Revolution in 1978/79, but after 1989 hundreds and hundreds of Russian nuclear scientists were hired on by the Iranians who offered exorbitant wages and golden palaces to them in order to secure their loyalty. This has to be seen on the background of Soviet living conditions in those days. No wonder the Iranians could pick and choose as they wished.

I am personally convinced that Iran quickly managed to duplicate the bombs and that their only obstacle was to produce sufficient quantities of enriched uranium or other substances for their bombs. As of today I am convinced that Iran has had the nuclear bomb already for some years and is now only waiting for a good opportunity to wipe Israel off the map.

(Question: Are there another warheads who were sold like this? And to whom?)

But that’s not all:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad questioned the official version of the Sept. 11 attacks and defended the right to cast doubt on the Holocaust in a tense appearance Monday at Columbia University, whose president accused the hard-line leader of behaving like “a petty and cruel dictator.”

Ahmadinejad smiled at first but appeared increasingly agitated, decrying the “insults” and “unfriendly treatment.” Columbia President Lee Bollinger and audience members took him to task over Iran’s human-rights record and foreign policy, as well as Ahmadinejad’s statements denying the Holocaust and calling for the disappearance of Israel.

“Mr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictator,” Bollinger said, to loud applause.

He said Ahmadinejad’s denial of the Holocaust might fool the illiterate and ignorant.

“When you come to a place like this it makes you simply ridiculous,” Bollinger said. “The truth is that the Holocaust is the most documented event in human history.”

Ahmadinejad rose, also to applause, and after a religious invocation, said Bollinger’s opening was “an insult to information and the knowledge of the audience here.”

“There were insults and claims that were incorrect, regretfully,” Ahmadinejad said, accusing Bollinger of falling under the influence of the hostile U.S. press and politicians. “I should not begin by being affected by this unfriendly treatment.”

During a question and answer session, Ahmadinejad appeared tense and unsmiling, in contrast to more relaxed interviews and appearances earlier in the day.

Ohh, little Ahmi was sad because they haven’t treated him as good as he though, hein?? 😈

Kate has linked to a live-blogging post from Columbia. Read it all. But I’m going to reproduce an excerpt which is very significant of Ahmi’s behaviour:

In response to a question about the treatment of homosexuals in Iran, Mr. Ahmadinejad was initially evasive, instead talking about the death penalty, which, he pointed out, exists in the United States. “People who violate the laws by using guns, creating insecurity selling guns, distributing guns at a high level are sentenced to execution in Iran,” he said. “Very few of these punishments are carried out in the public eye.”Pressed by Dean Coatsworth on the original question about the rights of gay men and lesbians in Iran, Mr. Ahmadinejad said: “In Iran, we don’t have homosexuals like in your country. We don’t have that in our country.”

The audience booed and hissed loudly. Some laughed, uncomfortably.

“In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon,” Mr. Ahmadinejad continued, undeterred. “I do not know who has told you that we have it. But as for women, maybe you think that maybe being a woman is a crime. It’s not a crime to be a woman. Women are the best creatures created by God. They represent the kindness, the beauty that God instills in them. Women are respected in Iran.”

And this other one, specially striking considering that he has defined himself before as a “university instructor“:

In his most pointed arguments yet, Mr. Ahmadinejad said that science and research had been used in the West as tools of oppression.

😯

But it’s much more shocking the attitude of Daily Kos readers towards Ahmadinejad. What a collection of moonbats!! 😡

Last may I wrote:

16-year-old girls hanged for having pre-marital sex [while stating that hanging is less cruel than being stoned to death…], beating peaceful young protesters in the street and women not-dressed Islamic way, detaining dogs for being Un-Islamic and beating (130 lashes) to a Norvegian-Iranian for drinking two beers, obliging the shop-keepers to saw off the mannequin breasts, etc, etc..

__________________

Así que según Ahmadenijad:

  1. decir “voy a borrar a Israel del mapa” no es tener una actitud ofensiva, es más, es querer tiernamente a Israel. Hay amores que matan… 😈 La cosa se complica porque, al parecer, en 1991, Kazajstán vendió tres cabezas nucleares a Irán, que fueron transportadas por varios contrabandistas, almacenadas en Lavizan. Los iraníes pudieron duplicarlas. Quien lo dice es un traductor y analista para las Fuerzas Especiales del Ejército Danés que estaba destinado a misiones en la zona de Oriente Medio en esa época.
  2. en Irán no hay un solo homosexual, pero luego se les detiene en manada.
  3. a las mujeres se las trata maravillosamente (maravillosamente mal, vamos), incluso se las pega si no se tapan (derecha).
  4. se define como un “instructor universitario” “que discute científicamente con sus alumnos semanalmente”, pero luego dice que “la ciencia y la investigación han sido usadas por Occidente como instrumentos de opresión”. Ejem…

En Irán, como podeis ver en los links de arriba “se ha colgado a chicas de 16 años por tener relaciones sexuales prematriamoniales, mientras se afirma que es mejor colgarlas que no lapidarlas ( 👿 ), se ha pegado a chicos porque estaban manifestándose pacíficamente y a mujeres como la de la imagen porque no iban vestidas a la manera islámica, se ha detenido a perros por no ser islámicos o se han dado 130 latigazos a un hombre de nacionalidad noruego-iraní por beber dos cervezas, se ha obligado a los propietarios de tiendas de moda a tapar los pechos de los maniquíes de los escaparates, etc“.

En fin, un mentiroso compulsivo.

Hallan restos de cable en el lugar del atentado que mató a dos soldados españoles

Si ayer veíamos que en Afganistán habían secuestrado a dos soldados italianos, hoy estos habían sido liberados (ambos están heridos, uno de ellos de manera seria). Pero también hoy nos hemos enterado de la muerte de dos soldados españoles en la misma zona. ¿La causa? Lo más probable es que fuera una bomba explosionada por control remoto:
Libertad Digital: Hallan restos de cable en el lugar del atentado que mató a dos soldados españoles

El Ministerio de Defensa informó en un principio de que el vehículo BMR en el que viajaban los dos soldados españoles muertos y los seis heridos en Afganistán había pisado una mina. Pero horas después el Departamento de José Antonio Alonso ha señalado, en un comunicado, que se han localizado restos de cable, en concreto 70 metros, en la zona del atentado, por lo que no descartan la hipótesis de una bomba explosionada por control remoto al paso de los militares españoles. Mientras, el presidente intentó convencer a los españoles de que se trata de una “misión de paz” y de que enviar nuevos soldados no es aumentar las tropas.

Los fallecidos son Germán Pérez Burgos y Stanley Mera Vera.

RIP.

Ayer escribía que EEUU había exigido a España el envío de más tropas SI quería colocar al general Sanz Roldán en la  OTAN. Pero a la vez, Zapatero, en vez de decir que a) en Afganistán se libra una guerra y b) el envío de nuevas tropas -que es necesario según ya escribí ayer- es porque quiere colocar al general, dice todo lo contrario…

_________________

Another two Spanish soldiers have died in Afghanistan. Although at first, it was thought that the BMR vehicle had gone over a mine, which exploded then, the discovery of a cable (of about 70 meters) in the attack surroundings, has made the military consider the possibility of a bomb, activated by remote control.

At the same time, PM Zapatero has tried to convince everyone that the mission in Afghanistan is “a peace mission” and that sending new soldiers there is not rising the number of Spanish troops deployed in the Asian country.

Yesterday, I wrote that USA had asked Spain for a rise in the number of troops deployed in Afghanistan, IF Zapatero wanted General Sanz Roldán to be new President of the Military Comission of NATO. Looks like Zapatero also forgot that part in his speech.

AFP: Iraq hopes for Russian debt deal by end of 2007

Filed under: Iraq,Russia — Nora @ 3:28 pm

AFP: Iraq hopes for Russian debt deal by end of 2007

Iraq hopes to reach a deal that will cancel 90 percent of its 13-billion-dollar (9.2-billion-euro) debt to Russia by the end of the year, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Friday.”We hope to sign an agreement by the end of the year” to cancel most of Baghdad’s Soviet-era debt to Moscow, Zebari said at the end of a three-day visit to Russia.

Moscow has already told the Paris Club, a group of financial officials from the world’s richest countries, it will write off 80 percent of Iraq’s debt, “though the Russians have told us it could reach 90 percent,” Zebari said.

The minister said the write-off would not give Russia an advantage as an investor in Iraq, particularly in its lucrative oil industry.

This is extraordinary…. I don’t like this, specially considering how Putin is… I don’t think Russia is not going to ask for anything in exchange. Specially considering the investments Russian companies had prior to US-led intervention in this country…

______________________________________

Irak cree que Rusia le condonará casi el 90% de la deuda, según el Ministro de Exteriores iraquí Hoshyar Zebari, lo que ha sido ratificado por un anuncio realizado por Moscú al Club de París. Pero lo extraordinario es que Moscú no ha exigido ninguna ventaja como inversor en Irak, ni siquiera en la industria del petróleo.

Lo que, al menos a mí, me parece raro: Rusia era uno de los países que más inversiones tenían en Iraq antes de la intervención liderada por EEUU. Por tanto, si no le exije obligaciones en relación a las inversiones en el país, ¿qué le está exigiendo a cambio? ¿O qué le va a exigir en el futuro? Yo no veo a Putin dejando que se le escape una oportunidad como ésta…

AFP: Iraq hopes for Russian debt deal by end of 2007

Filed under: En español,In English,Iraq/Irak,Rusia/Russia — Nora @ 2:51 pm

AFP: Iraq hopes for Russian debt deal by end of 2007

Iraq hopes to reach a deal that will cancel 90 percent of its 13-billion-dollar (9.2-billion-euro) debt to Russia by the end of the year, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Friday.”We hope to sign an agreement by the end of the year” to cancel most of Baghdad’s Soviet-era debt to Moscow, Zebari said at the end of a three-day visit to Russia.

Moscow has already told the Paris Club, a group of financial officials from the world’s richest countries, it will write off 80 percent of Iraq’s debt, “though the Russians have told us it could reach 90 percent,” Zebari said.

The minister said the write-off would not give Russia an advantage as an investor in Iraq, particularly in its lucrative oil industry.

This is extraordinary…. I don’t like this, specially considering how Putin is… I don’t think Russia is not going to ask for anything in exchange. Specially considering the investments Russian companies had prior to US-led intervention in this country…

______________________________________

Irak cree que Rusia le condonará casi el 90% de la deuda, según el Ministro de Exteriores iraquí Hoshyar Zebari, lo que ha sido ratificado por un anuncio realizado por Moscú al Club de París. Pero lo extraordinario es que Moscú no ha exigido ninguna ventaja como inversor en Irak, ni siquiera en la industria del petróleo.

Lo que, al menos a mí, me parece raro: Rusia era uno de los países que más inversiones tenían en Iraq antes de la intervención liderada por EEUU. Por tanto, si no le exije obligaciones en relación a las inversiones en el país, ¿qué le está exigiendo a cambio? ¿O qué le va a exigir en el futuro? Yo no veo a Putin dejando que se le escape una oportunidad como ésta…

El hachís como parte de la jihad

A great civilization is not conquered from without, until it has destroyed itself from within. William Durant

Una gran civilización no se conquista desde fuera, hasta que se ha destruido desde dentro. William Durant.

NUEVO DIGITAL Internacional – El hachís, “fuera de control” en el Reino Unido: Los derivados del cannabis, detrás de la masiva oleada de delincuencia tras ser desclasificados como drogas peligrosas

No sólo es una droga socialmente aceptada; también es otra de las puntas de una yihad que no únicamente se financia a gran escala con su tráfico en las zonas más occidentales de la Umma -en mortífera alianza con los mares de opio que rompen en Europa desde el Oriente Medio- sino que, explícitamente, introduce su calculado veneno para terminar de disolver la corrupta sociedad de los infieles, los renegados de la religión con que se nace y que entre ellos se matan, intoxican y neutralizan con su propia droga, la misma que ya fue considerada por los fieles al islam como propia de apóstatas y gente de baja estofa desde la Edad Media.

Se comenta en voz baja en las teterías de Madrid y, a poco que el cliente se gane la confianza del camarero norteafricano agnóstico, las confesiones comenzarán a llegar sobre lo que sucede en la parte de la clientela que no es la de los multiculturalistas jóvenes occidentales que viven, entre risotadas y porros, su aventura exótica a unos pocos de cientos de metros de la casa de papá y mamá. De la misma forma que muchos norteafricanos justifican ante los suyos el robo o el atraco a españoles porque así recuperan parte del botín que les corresponde como herederos de Al Ándalus, otros muchos confiesan no sentir ningún remordimiento en absoluto en repartir droga a jóvenes o niños porque se la venden “a cristianos” y, de paso, recuperan botín propio expoliado hace siglos con que financiar la recuperación de la tierra usurpada a Alá. Esos son los razonamientos de las conexiones droga-terrorismo que se encuentran tras las anónimas y frecuentes detenciones de la policía. El islamismo radical penetra de forma masiva entre la juventud árabe y musulmana occidental y ofrece sabiduría coránica para justificar la destrucción de la sociedad infiel, corrompiendo sus cimientos, sin necesidad de los alfanjes de los antepasados, sólo con la fuerza de la yihad de los vientres y de los derechos democráticos utilizados en su favor.

Hachís y delincuencia, “fuera de control”

El masivo consumo de derivados del cannabis se ha convertido en el factor que se encuentra tras lo que ya se admiten como oleadas de accidentes mortales de tráfico de fin de semana, en una alianza maldita en la que se federa con el alcohol, la otra gran droga de infieles. La Europa occidental siempre fue importadora neta del cannabis procedente del norte de África, con España como el gran puerto de desembarco para las redes de marroquíes, argelinos y tunecinos que, después, la distribuirían por Francia, el Reino Unido o la Holanda donde se consume legalmente junto con un café y la factura con IVA por ambos. Sin embargo, el mismo Reino Unido que hace unos pocos años desclasificó el cannabis como droga peligrosa en medio de la inclemente campaña ‘progresista’ occidental que hizo de su uso y consumo una de sus grandes y gloriosas banderas revolucionarias, ese mismo Reino Unido ve ahora con alarma cómo no sólo la supuestamente inocua droga se encuentra detrás de la incontrolable oleada de delincuencia que asola sus calles sino que el propio país se ha convertido en exportador neto de ella mientras profesores y policías aseguran que la situación se encuentra “fuera de control”.

[…] Ahora ya se admite sin ambages que “la reclasificación del cannabis alimenta la oleada de delincuencia juvenil” en el Reino Unido, constatación que se eleva como un humo espeso y azulado en dramáticos reportajes publicados por los mismos medios que una vez levantaron la bandera de la legalización de la droga para, sólo unos pocos años después, editar espectaculares portadas como gancho de no menos estremecidas admisiones de culpa y petición de disculpas ante la magnitud de la corrosión provocada por la otrora inocente hierba, y que, tras las anterioridades frivolidades, ahora se considera más peligrosa que el LSD. Sick [Menudos hipócritas….]

[…] Las organizaciones y profesionales que trabajan con jóvenes advierten de que el cannabis es consumido ya por entre el 75 y el 90 por ciento de los jóvenes delincuentes, en una imparable tendencia por la que el consumidor acude a delitos de baja o alta intensidad para financiar su adicción, y en una espiral maldita que, anteriormente, tan sólo estaba asociada a la heroína.

Desde hace varios meses, vengo leyendo posts y artículos en los que personas de variadas tendencias políticas e ideológicas, defienden la liberalización de las drogas porque, si se hiciera, daría como consecuencia una disminución de su precio, de su consumo y como consecuencia de todo lo anterior, disminuiría la inseguridad.

Aquí tenemos una prueba de que no. Francamente no tengo una opinión clara al respecto, pero no creo que la mejor idea sea que las drogas estén al alcance de adolescentes, todavía no suficientemente responsables, ni con la suficiente madurez como para decir que no a lo que todo el mundo puede tomar.

Pero es que en este caso, la cuestión es aún peor, porque el consumo de cannabis está ayudando a los que quieren conquistar Occidente y piden un Califato Global. Que además tiene por público objetivo a esos mismos adolescentes, con muchos recursos y mucho tiempo libre.

Si la juventud es el futuro y el futuro es destruido, ¿qué le queda a Occidente? At wits end Angry

Y esto no tienen culpa sólo los de la Jihad y los musulmanes/islamistas… Como dice la frase, la civilización tiene que ser destruida desde dentro. Pero para eso es necesario que no haya nadie que la defienda.

A esto hay que unir, el opio procedente de Afganistán (actualmente produce el 93% de los opiáceos mundiales) que llegará en breve.

______________________________

Great Britain, after a liberal campaign, declassified the haschisch as a dangerous drug. Today it has a great real problem as it is the cause of the surge in crime that worries both the teachers and the police, who spoke of a “situation out of control” and of the country, which was once an importer of the drug, but now is a net exporter of it.

But there is another problem, just hidden under the surface: the revenues obtained by the cannabis’ producers are used to finance jihad. And there are North Africans who consider that is correct to give drugs to children and teenagars as long as they are Christians and, in Spain, that gives them the opportunity to take back what they supposedly were stolen in the Reconquest of Al-Andalus.

Islamism is penetrating the core of the society by the corruption of minors and teenagers, without needing the swords, and using the wombs’ jihad and the democratic rights in their favour. And at the same time, there are groups that ask without any kind of restraint, for the Global Caliphate.

So the same MSM who supported the liberalisation of drugs as a new step towards freedom, are now scandalized of the dimension of the damages, and dedicate huge lines and front pages to the numbers which clearly show that it has been the main cause of the surge in juvenile crime.

The organizations which work with teenagers are now pointing out that between 75 and 90% of the teenage criminals are normal consumers of haschisch, and have to commit graver crimes each time, to pay for the cannabis they are addicted to.

So if the teenagers are the future, and the future is very cunningly destroyed, what future the West has? At wits end Angry

Crea un blog o un sitio web gratuitos con WordPress.com.